So I'm still getting started with the raw workflow. The issues of noise and other artifacts come up pretty often when I'm working on the moon pictures, especially at 400mm. The 70-300 seems like its not as sharp, but it also handles the noise a lot better. I don't shoot with it anymore, so there's no definite side-by-side comparison.
I processed another photo today of the moon with
RawTherapee, emphasizing better noise reduction (luminance, chrominance, and so on). Here's the result:
 |
| 400mm, 1/800s, f/11.0 @ ISO 200 |
For reference, here's the other processed image; it's a bit sharper, and the exposure compensation is obviously different:
No comments:
Post a Comment